Which statement differentiates Factitious Disorder from Malingering?

Prepare for the Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders Test with multiple choice questions and detailed answer explanations. Enhance your understanding and get exam-ready!

Multiple Choice

Which statement differentiates Factitious Disorder from Malingering?

Explanation:
The key idea is the motivation behind the deception. In Factitious Disorder, the person intentionally falsifies or induces symptoms to take on the sick role and receive care, attention, and psychological relief from being seen as ill—an internal, self-driven need. In contrast, Malingering involves deception to obtain external benefits, like money, medications, avoiding work, or other tangible rewards. So the statement that Factitious Disorder involves deception for internal psychological gain best captures this distinction. The other descriptions mix up where the incentive lies, attributing external rewards to Factitious Disorder or internal gain to Malingering. A helpful example is someone fabricating symptoms to be hospitalized for attention, not to receive a concrete external payoff.

The key idea is the motivation behind the deception. In Factitious Disorder, the person intentionally falsifies or induces symptoms to take on the sick role and receive care, attention, and psychological relief from being seen as ill—an internal, self-driven need. In contrast, Malingering involves deception to obtain external benefits, like money, medications, avoiding work, or other tangible rewards. So the statement that Factitious Disorder involves deception for internal psychological gain best captures this distinction. The other descriptions mix up where the incentive lies, attributing external rewards to Factitious Disorder or internal gain to Malingering. A helpful example is someone fabricating symptoms to be hospitalized for attention, not to receive a concrete external payoff.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy